Resumen
Decision-making in healthcare is complex and needs to be based on the best scientific evidence. In this pro-cess, information derived from statistical analysis of data is crucial, which can be developed from either frequentist or Bayesian perspectives. When it comes to the frequentist field, the null hypothesis significance test (NHST) and its p-value is one of the most widely used techniques in different disciplines. However, NHST has been subjected to questioning from different academic points of view, which has led to it being considered as one of the causes of the so-called replicability crisis in science. In this review article, we provide a brief historical account of its development, summarize the underlying methods, describe some controversies and limitations, address misuse and misinterpretation, and finally give some scopes and reflections in the context of biomedical research.
| Idioma original | Inglés estadounidense |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 422-430 |
| - | 9 |
| Publicación | Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica |
| Volumen | 41 |
| N.º | 4 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Indizado - 2024 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© 2024, Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública.
ODS de las Naciones Unidas
Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible
-
ODS 3: Salud y bienestar
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'THE NULL HYPOTHESIS SIGNIFICANCE TEST AND THE DICHOTOMIZATION OF THE P-VALUE: Errare Humanum Est'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver