TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative-Comparative Analysis of the Microscopic Changes of the Use of Sandblasting with 50 μm and 110 μm Aluminum Oxide Particles at the Base of the Brackets
AU - Flores-Osorio, Liz
AU - Infantes-Vargas, Jorge
AU - Pastor-Arenas, Sandra
AU - Alcazar-Aguilar, Oscar
AU - Alva-Mantari, Alicia
AU - Leon-Untiveros, Gina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Seventh Sense Research Group®
PY - 2025/4
Y1 - 2025/4
N2 - The objective of this study was to compare the microscopic changes in the base of the brackets after sandblasting with 50 μm and 110 μm aluminum oxide particles (Al2O3). Methods: The sample of this study will be made up of 60 premolar teeth that were extracted for orthodontic purposes; metal premolar brackets (Roth 0.022) were used in the brand GC Orthodontics Axcess. 2 groups of 30 brackets were divided and adhered to the vestibular surface of the teeth of the entire sample, the adhesion was photopolymerized using an LED lamp for 10 seconds in each bracket. The first group was sandblasted with 50-micron aluminum oxide. The first shear was then performed, and the second shear was performed after one week. The other group of brackets was sandblasted with 110 μm aluminum oxide. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and tests. The mesh of the brackets was evaluated with the adhesive residue index using a stereoscopic microscope with 10X magnification.
AB - The objective of this study was to compare the microscopic changes in the base of the brackets after sandblasting with 50 μm and 110 μm aluminum oxide particles (Al2O3). Methods: The sample of this study will be made up of 60 premolar teeth that were extracted for orthodontic purposes; metal premolar brackets (Roth 0.022) were used in the brand GC Orthodontics Axcess. 2 groups of 30 brackets were divided and adhered to the vestibular surface of the teeth of the entire sample, the adhesion was photopolymerized using an LED lamp for 10 seconds in each bracket. The first group was sandblasted with 50-micron aluminum oxide. The first shear was then performed, and the second shear was performed after one week. The other group of brackets was sandblasted with 110 μm aluminum oxide. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and tests. The mesh of the brackets was evaluated with the adhesive residue index using a stereoscopic microscope with 10X magnification.
KW - Aluminum oxide
KW - Bracket
KW - Orthodontic Brackets
KW - Sandblasting
KW - Surface Treatment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105003729585
U2 - 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V73I4P109
DO - 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V73I4P109
M3 - Original Article
AN - SCOPUS:105003729585
SN - 2349-0918
VL - 73
SP - 92
EP - 103
JO - International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology
JF - International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology
IS - 4
ER -