TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric properties of the Questionnaire for the evaluation of digital learning in higher education in Peruvian university students
AU - Fuster-Guillen, Doris
AU - Shuan, Reyna Luisa Cruz
AU - Espinoza, Jose Olivera
AU - Hernández, Ronald M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, Jacobs Verlag. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This research presented the results of the process of creation and arrangement of the psychometric characteristics of the Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Digital Learning in Higher Education (QEDLHE). With a quantitative, predominantly instrumental approach, 379 students from different universities in Peru were considered for the validity and reliability stage. The reliability of instruments was assessed using the method of split halves with Pearson and Cronbach's Alpha ratified by the Guttman coefficient; in the exploratory factor analysis, the KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) contrast and Bartlett's test were used, the rotation method for convergence with Varimax with Kaiser normalization; in the confirmatory factor analysis, the AMOS23 tool was used. Two models were used to compare the best fit indicators as a result. The conclusions show that the instrument has been operationalized theoretically by five dimensions composed of twenty-four items.
AB - This research presented the results of the process of creation and arrangement of the psychometric characteristics of the Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Digital Learning in Higher Education (QEDLHE). With a quantitative, predominantly instrumental approach, 379 students from different universities in Peru were considered for the validity and reliability stage. The reliability of instruments was assessed using the method of split halves with Pearson and Cronbach's Alpha ratified by the Guttman coefficient; in the exploratory factor analysis, the KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) contrast and Bartlett's test were used, the rotation method for convergence with Varimax with Kaiser normalization; in the confirmatory factor analysis, the AMOS23 tool was used. Two models were used to compare the best fit indicators as a result. The conclusions show that the instrument has been operationalized theoretically by five dimensions composed of twenty-four items.
KW - Evaluation
KW - Feedback
KW - Feedforward
KW - Learning
KW - Virtual-environments
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85204235166&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.70135/seejph.vi.815
DO - 10.70135/seejph.vi.815
M3 - Original Article
AN - SCOPUS:85204235166
SN - 2197-5248
VL - 23
SP - 6
EP - 15
JO - South Eastern European Journal of Public Health
JF - South Eastern European Journal of Public Health
IS - 3
ER -
