TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum
T2 - Convergence between the dimensional PD models of ICD-11 and DSM-5: a meta-analytic approach (Front. Psychiatry., (2013), 14, 1325583, 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1325583)
AU - Hualparuca-Olivera, Luis
AU - Caycho-Rodríguez, Tomás
AU - Torales, Julio
AU - Ramos-Campos, Dayana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Hualparuca-Olivera, Caycho-Rodríguez, Torales and Ramos-Campos.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - In the published article, there was an error in Table 1, 7. Damovsky et al. (35), Column 6. Two incorrect r coefficients were mentioned. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, they should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively. In the published article, there was an error in Figure 1. The figure showed incorrect correlation indices for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DT <-> PID-5-BF+_DT’ and for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DL <-> PID-5-BF+_ANT’. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, it should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively. The correct Figure 1 appears below. In the published article, there was an error in Supplementary Figure S3. The figure showed incorrect correlation indices for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DT <-> PID-5-BF+_DT’ and for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DL <-> PID-5-BF+_ANT’. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, it should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively. In the published article, there was an error in 3 Results, 3.1 Description of the chosen studies, Paragraph 2. This sentence previously stated: “The range of the correlation coefficients r was from 0.31 to 0.74 between the severity measures of both models; and r from 0 to 0.89, between the trait scales of both models.” The corrected sentence appears below: “The range of the correlation coefficients r was from 0.31 to 0.74 between the severity measures of both models; and r from 0.26 to 0.89, between the trait scales of both models.” The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
AB - In the published article, there was an error in Table 1, 7. Damovsky et al. (35), Column 6. Two incorrect r coefficients were mentioned. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, they should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively. In the published article, there was an error in Figure 1. The figure showed incorrect correlation indices for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DT <-> PID-5-BF+_DT’ and for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DL <-> PID-5-BF+_ANT’. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, it should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively. The correct Figure 1 appears below. In the published article, there was an error in Supplementary Figure S3. The figure showed incorrect correlation indices for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DT <-> PID-5-BF+_DT’ and for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DL <-> PID-5-BF+_ANT’. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, it should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively. In the published article, there was an error in 3 Results, 3.1 Description of the chosen studies, Paragraph 2. This sentence previously stated: “The range of the correlation coefficients r was from 0.31 to 0.74 between the severity measures of both models; and r from 0 to 0.89, between the trait scales of both models.” The corrected sentence appears below: “The range of the correlation coefficients r was from 0.31 to 0.74 between the severity measures of both models; and r from 0.26 to 0.89, between the trait scales of both models.” The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
KW - DSM-5
KW - ICD-11
KW - convergent validity
KW - dimensional models
KW - meta-analysis
KW - personality disorder
KW - severity
KW - traits
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85189609697&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1366574
DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1366574
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85189609697
SN - 1664-0640
VL - 15
JO - Frontiers in Psychiatry
JF - Frontiers in Psychiatry
M1 - 1366574
ER -