TY - JOUR
T1 - Community risk of environmental-borne cystic echinococcosis transmission in South America
T2 - Results from the multistep cross-sectional and case-control PERITAS study
AU - Acosta-Jamett, Gerardo
AU - Tamarozzi, Francesca
AU - Castro, Natalia
AU - Santivanez, Saul J.
AU - Laurente, Raul Enriquez
AU - Mazzi, Cristina
AU - Alvarez-Rojas, Cristian A.
AU - Casulli, Adriano
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Acosta-Jamett et al.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is mainly described as a food/waterborne zoonosis. However, evidence about matrices contamination is scarce. Identifying main transmission routes could optimize health messages aiming to prevent ingestion of parasite eggs. We evaluated Echinococcus granulosus contamination of matrices in two areas of Chile and Peru. Methodology/principal findings In stage 1, areas with high active CE prevalence were identified through cross-sectional ultrasound surveys. Stage 2 was a case-control study encompassing matrices sampling in public places and households with and without CE cases in these areas, followed by (stage 3), matrices processing by sequential sieving and E. granulosus detection by PCR. Bayesian multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with risk of contamination. In house-holds, soil (19%-42%); dogs’ fur (10%-30%); shoes’ soles (5%-33%); and dogs’ feces (0–50%) were highly contaminated. In public areas, ~ 30% of fecal and soil samples were contaminated. Overall, matrices from public areas were more contaminated than those from households. When examining households, there was no difference in risk of contamination according to presence of CE cases, while CE-free households had lower risk when considering households and public areas. There was no difference in risk of contamination according to matrix. Vegetables were PCR-negative. Conclusions/significance Results suggest the need for a paradigm-shift towards considering CE an environmental-borne infection with a “community risk” to which people are exposed.
AB - Background Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is mainly described as a food/waterborne zoonosis. However, evidence about matrices contamination is scarce. Identifying main transmission routes could optimize health messages aiming to prevent ingestion of parasite eggs. We evaluated Echinococcus granulosus contamination of matrices in two areas of Chile and Peru. Methodology/principal findings In stage 1, areas with high active CE prevalence were identified through cross-sectional ultrasound surveys. Stage 2 was a case-control study encompassing matrices sampling in public places and households with and without CE cases in these areas, followed by (stage 3), matrices processing by sequential sieving and E. granulosus detection by PCR. Bayesian multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with risk of contamination. In house-holds, soil (19%-42%); dogs’ fur (10%-30%); shoes’ soles (5%-33%); and dogs’ feces (0–50%) were highly contaminated. In public areas, ~ 30% of fecal and soil samples were contaminated. Overall, matrices from public areas were more contaminated than those from households. When examining households, there was no difference in risk of contamination according to presence of CE cases, while CE-free households had lower risk when considering households and public areas. There was no difference in risk of contamination according to matrix. Vegetables were PCR-negative. Conclusions/significance Results suggest the need for a paradigm-shift towards considering CE an environmental-borne infection with a “community risk” to which people are exposed.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105013525531
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013382
DO - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013382
M3 - Original Article
C2 - 40768542
AN - SCOPUS:105013525531
SN - 1935-2727
VL - August-2025
JO - PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
JF - PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
M1 - e0013382
ER -