Analysis of the Mechanical Properties of Adobe with Chillihua Fibre and Recycled LDPE for Sustainable Construction in the Andes

N.C.P. Curi, S.M.M. Villanera, L.R.R. Ricaldi, M.I.L. Luna

Producción científica: Artículo CientíficoArtículo originalrevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

In the Andean regions of Peru, Andean house construction in Peru relies heavily on adobe as the main material, characterized by an entrenched self-construction system. This method faces significant challenges in terms of durability and structural strength, especially in areas exposed to flooding and seismic movements, due to the inherent low mechanical properties of adobe. In response to these limitations, research has explored the improvement of the mechanical properties of adobe by incorporating readily available fibers, such as chillihua fiber (CF), a plant that grows in the high Andean zone. At the same time, efforts have been made to reduce environmental pollution by reusing plastic waste, such as low-density polyethylene (LDPE), due to its slow decomposition process. This research work evaluates the mechanical properties of adobe modified by incorporating CF fiber and recycled LDPE in the Andean region of Huancayo. Evaluations of the physical properties of the soil in situ were carried out to verify its suitability, followed by tests of granulometry, moisture content and plasticity index (PI). Subsequently, compressive strength
and absorption strength tests were developed to evaluate the mechanical properties of the stabilized adobes. The tudy was divided into control and experimental groups with varying concentrations of CF fiber and recycled LDPE (0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5% and 6%). The results showed that adobes stabilized with CF and recycled LDPE exhibit significant improvement in their compressive, indirect tensile, flexural and absorption strength, increasing load-bearing capacity and improving water absorption resistance. These improvements potentially contribute positively to the durability and structural stability of buildings with a variation of the cost of a conventional wall per m2 versus a stabilized wall of only
6.86%
Idioma originalInglés estadounidense
-209
Páginas (desde-hasta)17
-193
PublicaciónCivil Engineering and Architecture
DOI
EstadoIndizado - 1 ene. 2025

Citar esto