Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Utilidad diagnóstica de la prueba de riesgo de la Asociación Americana de Diabetes para prediabetes y diabetes. Una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis

Translated title of the contribution: Diagnostic utility of the American Diabetes Association risk test for prediabetes and diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Víctor Juan Vera-Ponce
  • , Gianella Zulema Zeñas-Trujillo
  • , Joan A. Loayza-Castro
  • , Fiorella E. Zuzunaga-Montoya
  • , Mario J. Valladares-Garrido

Research output: Contribution to journalOriginal Articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Given the increase in cases of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) worldwide, and the limited access to laboratory analysis in several places, it is necessary to have the implementation of a simple, fast, and without-detection method. laboratory: the American Diabetes Association (ADA) risk test: the ADA test risk score (ADATRS). Objective: To carry out a systematic review (SR) with meta-analysis on the diagnostic utility of the ADATRS for prediabetes and DM2. Methodology: SR with meta-analysis of studies of diagnostic tests. The search was conducted in four databases: PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science and EMBASE. True positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives were obtained for each study. 2×2 tables were constructed based on the information from the article or from the authors. Thus, forest diagrams were presented with a 95% confidence interval (95%CI), both for the overall sensitivity and specificity of the ADATRS for both events of interest. Results: Forest plots revealed that the sensitivity and specificity for prediabetes were 0.91 (95%CI: 0.82-0.96) and 0.52 (95%CI: 0.36-0.67), respectively. While for DM2, the combined sensitivity and specificity were 0.85 (95%CI: 0.71-0.93) and 0.56 (95%CI: 0.47-0.65), respectively. Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature suggests that the ADATRS may be useful as a screening method for prediabetes and DM2, given its high sensitivity. However, there is a lot of heterogeneity and few studies even in this regard; therefore, more research work is needed in different populations and with more standardized methods to finally determine the clinical importance of this questionnaire as a screening or diagnostic tool for prediabetes or DM2.

Translated title of the contributionDiagnostic utility of the American Diabetes Association risk test for prediabetes and diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)182-194
Number of pages13
JournalRevista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StateIndexed - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Asociacion Espanola de Dietistas-Nutricionistas. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic utility of the American Diabetes Association risk test for prediabetes and diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this