Abstract
This paper analyses how the absolute prohibition of the death penalty, which has gradually become established as a rule of customary international law, can apply to serious international crimes. To this end, we will analyse the debate on the absolute prohibition of this punishment and the possibility of the emergence of a jus cogens norm providing for its abolition. We shall examine the punishable penalties as set out in the Court's founding treaty, in particular Article 80. We will conclude that the exclusion of capital punishment from the Rome Statute would be part of a broader abolitionist trend that has consolidated internationally; nevertheless, from a combined analysis of the practice of states and the provisions of the treaty, the choice of the penalties to be imposed would remain the prerogative of states, undermining the real possibility of consolidating a new imperative norm of International Law.
| Translated title of the contribution | On the deterrent value of the absolute prohibition of the death penalty for serious international crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court |
|---|---|
| Original language | Undefined/Unknown |
| Journal | Prudentia Iuris |
| Volume | 2024 |
| Issue number | 98 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Indexed - 9 Dec 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024, Pontificia Universidad Catolica Argentina. All rights reserved.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Death penalty
- International Criminal Court
- International crimes
- Ius cogens
- Principle of complementarity
- Punishments
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On the deterrent value of the absolute prohibition of the death penalty for serious international crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver