Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Correlation between the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer and the California Bearing Ratio for Subgrade Soils

  • Boris Senin Carhuallanqui Parian
  • , Yazmín de la Cruz Jeremías
  • , Janet Yéssica Andía Arias
  • , Víctor Peña Dueñas
  • , Albert Jorddy Valenzuela Inga
  • , Rosali Ramos Rojas

Research output: Contribution to journalOriginal Articlepeer-review

Abstract

The assessment of soil bearing capacity is fundamental for pavement design, but the traditional California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test is time-consuming and costly. The Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) offers a rapid and cost-effective field alternative. This study develops and validates correlation models between CBR and DCP for clayey, granular, and clayey-granular soils. The analysis was based on 15 CBR tests and evaluated against four established DCP correlation models: Kleyn and Van Heerden, TRL Overseas Road Note 8, US Corps of Engineers, and MOPT Colombia 1992. Results demonstrate that a cubic regression model consistently provides the best fit for all soil types, achieving coefficients of determination (R²) as high as 0.96 for granular soils and exceeding 0.89 for clayey soils. The findings confirm that the DCP test, when paired with the validated cubic correlations, constitutes a precise and efficient tool for estimating CBR, covering efficient on-site testing and information for preliminary design in pavement subgrade.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)12-25
Number of pages14
JournalSSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering
Volume12
Issue number12
DOIs
StateIndexed - Dec 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Seventh Sense Research Group®.

Keywords

  • CBR-DCP correlation
  • California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
  • Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP)
  • Geotechnical engineering
  • Soil characterization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correlation between the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer and the California Bearing Ratio for Subgrade Soils'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this